Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-25805

Zed ≤ 0.219.4

Public PoC
Published
10 February 2026
Modified
19 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0024 15th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-25805 is a medium-severity Product UI does not Warn User of Unsafe Actions (CWE-356) vulnerability in Zed Zed. Its CVSS base score is 6.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique User Execution (T1204); ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-25805 affects Zed, a multiplayer code editor, in versions prior to 0.219.4. The vulnerability stems from the application's failure to display the parameters used when invoking tools, both at the time of requesting user allowance and afterward. This lack of visibility (classified under CWE-356) enables potentially unwanted or malicious parameter values to be executed without user awareness. The issue carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.4 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Exploitation requires network access, high privileges (such as those held by a collaborator in a multiplayer session), high attack complexity, and user interaction in the form of granting permission to the tool invocation. An attacker could craft a tool call with malicious parameters, tricking the user into approving it unknowingly, potentially leading to high-impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability violations on the victim's system.

The Zed project patched this in version 0.219.4 by adding expandable details for tool calls, enabling users to inspect parameters before and after invocation. Additional details are available in the GitHub Security Advisory at https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/security/advisories/GHSA-f2g4-87h6-4pxq.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Zed is a multiplayer code editor. Prior to 0.219.4, Zed does not show with which parameters a tool is being invoked, when asking for allowance. Further it does not show after the tool was being invoked, which parameters were used.…

more

Thus, maybe unwanted or even malicious values could be used without the user having a chance to notice it. Patched in Zed Editor 0.219.4 which includes expandable tool call details.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1204 User Execution Execution
An adversary may rely upon specific actions by a user in order to gain execution.
T1204.001 Malicious Link Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user clicking a malicious link in order to gain execution.
T1204.002 Malicious File Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution.
T1204.004 Malicious Copy and Paste Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user copying and pasting code in order to gain execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-44461Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-44466Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-44465Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-27976Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-27800Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2025-68432Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-44463Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-44462Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2026-27967Same product: Zed Zed
CVE-2025-68433Same product: Zed Zed

Affected Assets

zed
zed
≤ 0.219.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-356

Mandates explicit user-visible indication, directly countering absence of warnings for device activation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices include UI design requirements that warn users before unsafe actions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can verify presence of warnings for unsafe user actions.

prevents

Security awareness training can teach users to heed or demand warnings for unsafe actions.

prevents

Secure development life cycle requires UI design to warn users before unsafe actions.

prevents

Application security requirements include user warnings for dangerous operations.

prevents

Secure architecture principles can mandate confirmation prompts for risky actions.

prevents

Secure coding practices can embed user warnings before unsafe operations.

References