Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-26321

Path Traversal in Openclaw ≤ 2026.2.14

Published
19 February 2026
Modified
20 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0048 39th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-26321 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data from Local System (T1005); ranked at the 39th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Enterprise AI Assistants; in the Privacy and Disclosure risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-26321 is a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) in the Feishu extension of OpenClaw, a personal AI assistant, affecting versions prior to 2026.2.14. The `sendMediaFeishu` function improperly treats attacker-controlled `mediaUrl` values as local filesystem paths, allowing direct reading of arbitrary files on the host system.

Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely without privileges (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N) if they can influence tool calls, either directly or via prompt injection techniques common in AI assistants. By supplying a sensitive local path such as `/etc/passwd` as the `mediaUrl`, they can exfiltrate file contents, achieving high confidentiality impact as reflected in the CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 (C:H/I:N/A:N/S:U).

The official mitigation is to upgrade to OpenClaw version 2026.2.14 or newer, which eliminates direct local file reads in this function and redirects media loading through hardened helpers that enforce local-root restrictions. Details are provided in the OpenClaw GitHub security advisory (GHSA-8jpq-5h99-ff5r), the release notes for v2026.2.14, and the fix commit (5b4121d6011a48c71e747e3c18197f180b872c5d).

This issue underscores risks in AI assistant tool extensions, where prompt injection can lead to local file disclosure. No real-world exploitation has been reported as of the CVE publication on 2026-02-19.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

OpenClaw is a personal AI assistant. Prior to OpenClaw version 2026.2.14, the Feishu extension previously allowed `sendMediaFeishu` to treat attacker-controlled `mediaUrl` values as local filesystem paths and read them directly. If an attacker can influence tool calls (directly or via…

more

prompt injection), they may be able to exfiltrate local files by supplying paths such as `/etc/passwd` as `mediaUrl`. Upgrade to OpenClaw `2026.2.14` or newer to receive a fix. The fix removes direct local file reads from this path and routes media loading through hardened helpers that enforce local-root restrictions.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
Enterprise AI Assistants
Risk Domain
Privacy and Disclosure
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: ai, prompt injection

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
Why these techniques?

Path traversal in sendMediaFeishu directly allows arbitrary local file reads (e.g. /etc/passwd), enabling collection of data from the local filesystem without requiring additional access primitives.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-26329Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-44996Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-41363Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-27522Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-41911Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-53825Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32846Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32061Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32033Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-35668Same product: Openclaw Openclaw

Affected Assets

openclaw
openclaw
≤ 2026.2.14

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Validates attacker-controlled mediaUrl inputs to block path traversal attempts that treat them as local filesystem paths for arbitrary file reads.

prevent

Enforces access control policies to restrict filesystem reads to authorized paths only, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive local files like /etc/passwd.

prevent

Mandates timely flaw remediation through software upgrades to versions like OpenClaw 2026.2.14 that eliminate direct local file reads in the vulnerable function.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References