Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-27651

Memory Safety in F5 Nginx Plus r33 – r35

Published
24 March 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0094 58th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-27651 is a high-severity NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476) vulnerability in F5 Nginx Plus. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked in the top 42% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-27651 affects the ngx_mail_auth_http_module in NGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source. When this module is enabled alongside CRAM-MD5 or APOP authentication, and the authentication server permits retries via the Auth-Wait response header, undisclosed requests can cause worker processes to terminate. Classified as CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference), it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating high availability impact with no effects on confidentiality or integrity. Versions that have reached End of Technical Support are not evaluated.

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. By sending the undisclosed requests to a vulnerable NGINX mail proxy configuration, they can repeatedly terminate worker processes, resulting in denial of service through resource exhaustion or service disruption.

The F5 advisory (K000160383) provides further details on this issue, available at https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000160383.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

When the ngx_mail_auth_http_module module is enabled on NGINX Plus or NGINX Open Source, undisclosed requests can cause worker processes to terminate. This issue may occur when (1) CRAM-MD5 or APOP authentication is enabled, and (2) the authentication server permits retry…

more

by returning the Auth-Wait response header. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
T1489 Service Stop Impact
Adversaries may stop or disable services on a system to render those services unavailable to legitimate users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-24989Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2024-35200Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2026-27654Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2024-7347Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2025-53859Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2026-32647Same product: F5 Nginx Open Source
CVE-2025-41433Same vendor: F5
CVE-2025-20045Same vendor: F5
CVE-2024-25560Same vendor: F5
CVE-2025-52585Same vendor: F5

Affected Assets

f5
nginx open source
0.5.15 — 0.9.7 · 1.0.0 — 1.28.3 · 1.29.0 — 1.29.7
f5
nginx plus
r32, r35, r36 · r33 — r35

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including static analysis) directly finds null-dereference bugs before deployment.

Documented development standards and tools can enforce null-safety rules and safe pointer usage.

Engineering principles can mandate defensive coding such as explicit null checks before dereference.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (static analysis, code review, safe coding standards) directly prevent NULL dereference bugs during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect NULL dereference defects before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates defensive coding practices that can prevent NULL dereferences.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input validation and pointer-safety rules.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage defensive design that avoids unsafe pointer use.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require NULL-pointer checks and safe dereference patterns.

References