Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-27766

Race Condition

Published
19 May 2026
Modified
24 July 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 5.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0010 1th percentile
Risk Priority 40 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-27766 is a medium-severity Signal Handler Race Condition (CWE-364) vulnerability in Gitcode (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

in OpenHarmony v6.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause information leak.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-42002Shared CWE-364
CVE-2024-6409Shared CWE-364
CVE-2025-4598Shared CWE-364
CVE-2026-24792Shared CWE-364
CVE-2024-7589Shared CWE-364
CVE-2023-5676Shared CWE-364
CVE-2024-6387Shared CWE-364
CVE-2023-1285Shared CWE-364
CVE-2026-34771Shared CWE-364
CVE-2026-53185Shared CWE-364

Affected Assets

Gitcode
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including concurrency and fuzz testing) can discover signal-handler race conditions before deployment.

Engineering principles such as least privilege, complete mediation, and avoidance of shared mutable state in handlers directly reduce introduction of signal-handler race conditions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent introduction of signal-handler race conditions during coding and review.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect signal-handler race conditions before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can require avoidance of unsafe signal handling patterns.

degrades

Secure architecture principles can mandate safe concurrency and signal design.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit race-prone signal handlers.

mitigates

Change management may catch unsafe signal code during reviews but does not address the weakness itself.

References