Security Resilience

CVE-2026-2801

Mozilla Firefox ≤ 148.0

Published
24 February 2026
Modified
13 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0055 45th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-2801 is a high-severity Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions (CWE-754) vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 45th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-2801 is a vulnerability involving incorrect boundary conditions in the JavaScript WebAssembly component of Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird. It affects versions prior to Firefox 148 and Thunderbird 148, where improper handling of boundary checks in WebAssembly processing can lead to issues. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-754 (Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions) and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5.

Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity, requiring no privileges or user interaction. Successful exploitation results in high-impact denial of service, potentially crashing the affected browser or mail client without compromising confidentiality or integrity.

Mozilla's security advisories (MFSA 2026-13 and MFSA 2026-16) and the associated Bugzilla entry (bug 2009901) confirm the issue was addressed in Firefox 148 and Thunderbird 148. Security practitioners should ensure users update to these patched versions to mitigate the risk.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Incorrect boundary conditions in the JavaScript: WebAssembly component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 148 and Thunderbird 148.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-6772Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2025-10532Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-6766Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2025-14322Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-8091Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-4694Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2026-4689Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2023-4583Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2023-23602Same product: Mozilla Firefox
CVE-2025-5272Same product: Mozilla Firefox

Affected Assets

mozilla
firefox
≤ 148.0
mozilla
thunderbird
≤ 148.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation explicitly exercises unusual conditions to find missing or incorrect checks.

Input validation directly requires checking for unexpected or malformed conditions before they propagate.

Security engineering principles include structured handling of edge cases and exceptions during design.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging can record unhandled exceptions but does not prevent the weakness itself.

finds

Monitoring may detect symptoms of unhandled conditions but does not eliminate the root weakness.

blocks

Secure development life cycle mandates exception handling and input validation that directly prevent missing checks for unusual conditions.

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for handling of exceptional conditions and error paths.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (fail securely, least privilege, distrust external input, security-oriented design reviews) that reach some but not most CWE-754 cases; many exceptional-condition checks live in low-level code paths outside architecture-level engineering.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate proper checks for exceptional and unusual conditions.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-754, a class-level weakness. Rules are authored against its narrower children: CWE-354.

References