Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-30953

SSRF in Linkace ≤ 2.0.0

Published
10 March 2026
Modified
17 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0022 12th percentile
Risk Priority 53 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-30953 is a high-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Linkace Linkace. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 12th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-30953 is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability, mapped to CWE-918, in LinkAce, a self-hosted archive for collecting website links. The flaw occurs during link creation via POST /links, where the server fetches HTML metadata from the user-provided URL through LinkRepository::create() invoking HtmlMeta::getFromUrl(). The LinkStoreRequest validation rules omit the NoPrivateIpRule, enabling server-side requests to internal network addresses, Docker service hostnames, and cloud metadata endpoints, despite the rule's existence in app/Rules/NoPrivateIpRule.php and its use in FetchController.php (line 99).

An authenticated user with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). By supplying a crafted URL in a link creation request, the attacker causes the server to fetch from restricted internal endpoints, resulting in high confidentiality impact (C:H) across a changed scope (S:C), with no integrity or availability effects (I:N/A:N), per the CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.7.

The GitHub security advisory at https://github.com/Kovah/LinkAce/security/advisories/GHSA-f2mp-q78r-7jx7 provides further details on the vulnerability, including recommended mitigations and patches.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

LinkAce is a self-hosted archive to collect website links. When a user creates a link via POST /links, the server fetches HTML metadata from the provided URL (LinkRepository::create() calls HtmlMeta::getFromUrl()). The LinkStoreRequest validation rules do not include NoPrivateIpRule, allowing server-side…

more

requests to internal network addresses, Docker service hostnames, and cloud metadata endpoints. The project already has a NoPrivateIpRule class (app/Rules/NoPrivateIpRule.php) but it is only applied in FetchController.php (line 99), not in the primary link creation path.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-35516Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2026-33953Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2025-62719Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2026-30954Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2025-62722Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2025-59424Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2024-56508Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2024-56507Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2025-53838Same product: Linkace Linkace
CVE-2026-33954Same product: Linkace Linkace

Affected Assets

linkace
linkace
≤ 2.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Operational threat data describing SSRF campaigns can be used to tighten outbound-request allow-lists and detection rules before attackers exploit them.

References