Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-31765 is a medium-severity NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476) vulnerability in Linux Linux Kernel. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-26578
Vulnerability Data
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: Change AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE to 64KB Currently, AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE is hardcoded to 8KB, while KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE is defined as 2 * PAGE_SIZE. On systems with 4K pages, both values match (8KB), so allocation…
more
and reserved space are consistent. However, on 64K page-size systems, KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE becomes 128KB, while the reserved trap area remains 8KB. This mismatch causes the kernel to crash when running rocminfo or rccl unit tests. Kernel attempted to read user page (2) - exploit attempt? (uid: 1001) BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000002 Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002c8a64 Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries CPU: 34 UID: 1001 PID: 9379 Comm: rocminfo Tainted: G E 6.19.0-rc4-amdgpu-00320-gf23176405700 #56 VOLUNTARY Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: IBM,9105-42A POWER10 (architected) 0x800200 0xf000006 of:IBM,FW1060.30 (ML1060_896) hv:phyp pSeries NIP: c0000000002c8a64 LR: c00000000125dbc8 CTR: c00000000125e730 REGS: c0000001e0957580 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G E MSR: 8000000000009033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24008268 XER: 00000036 CFAR: c00000000125dbc4 DAR: 0000000000000002 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 1 GPR00: c00000000125d908 c0000001e0957820 c0000000016e8100 c00000013d814540 GPR04: 0000000000000002 c00000013d814550 0000000000000045 0000000000000000 GPR08: c00000013444d000 c00000013d814538 c00000013d814538 0000000084002268 GPR12: c00000000125e730 c000007e2ffd5f00 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000020000 GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 c00000015f653000 0000000000000000 GPR20: c000000138662400 c00000013d814540 0000000000000000 c00000013d814500 GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 c0000001e0957888 c0000001e0957878 GPR28: c00000013d814548 0000000000000000 c00000013d814540 c0000001e0957888 NIP [c0000000002c8a64] __mutex_add_waiter+0x24/0xc0 LR [c00000000125dbc8] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x318/0xd00 Call Trace: 0xc0000001e0957890 (unreliable) __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x58/0xd00 amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6fc/0xb60 [amdgpu] kfd_process_alloc_gpuvm+0x54/0x1f0 [amdgpu] kfd_process_device_init_cwsr_dgpu+0xa4/0x1a0 [amdgpu] kfd_process_device_init_vm+0xd8/0x2e0 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl_acquire_vm+0xd0/0x130 [amdgpu] kfd_ioctl+0x514/0x670 [amdgpu] sys_ioctl+0x134/0x180 system_call_exception+0x114/0x300 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec This patch changes AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE to 64 KB and KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE to the AMD GPU page size. This means we reserve 64 KB for the trap in the address space, but only allocate 8 KB within it. With this approach, the allocation size never exceeds the reserved area. (cherry picked from commit 31b8de5e55666f26ea7ece5f412b83eab3f56dbb)
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including static analysis) directly finds null-dereference bugs before deployment.
Documented development standards and tools can enforce null-safety rules and safe pointer usage.
Engineering principles can mandate defensive coding such as explicit null checks before dereference.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (static analysis, code review, safe coding standards) directly prevent NULL dereference bugs during development.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect NULL dereference defects before release.
Secure SDLC mandates defensive coding practices that can prevent NULL dereferences.
Application security requirements can specify input validation and pointer-safety rules.
Secure architecture principles encourage defensive design that avoids unsafe pointer use.
Secure coding standards directly require NULL-pointer checks and safe dereference patterns.