Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-32024

Openclaw ≤ 2026.2.22

Public PoC
Published
19 March 2026
Modified
23 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0033 25th percentile
Risk Priority 30 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-32024 is a medium-severity Link Following (CWE-59) vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 25th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-32024, published on 2026-03-19, is a symlink traversal vulnerability (CWE-59) in the avatar handling component of OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22. It allows attackers to read arbitrary files outside the configured workspace boundary by exploiting symlinks, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.5 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N), reflecting high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability effects.

Remote attackers can exploit the vulnerability by requesting avatar resources through gateway surfaces, disclosing local files accessible to the OpenClaw process. Although the CVSS vector specifies local attack vector and low privileges required, the description confirms remote exploitation potential via these resource requests.

Mitigation is addressed in OpenClaw version 2026.2.22 and later, with fixes implemented in GitHub commits 3d0337504349954237d09e4d957df5cb844d5e77 and 6970c2c2db3ee069ef0fff0ade5cfbdd0134f9d2. Further details on the vulnerability and remediation are provided in the GitHub Security Advisory at GHSA-rx3g-mvc3-qfjf and the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-symlink-traversal-in-avatar-handling.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.22 contain a symlink traversal vulnerability in avatar handling that allows attackers to read arbitrary files outside the configured workspace boundary. Remote attackers can exploit this by requesting avatar resources through gateway surfaces to disclose local…

more

files accessible to the OpenClaw process.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
T1547.009 Shortcut Modification Persistence
Adversaries may create or modify shortcuts that can execute a program during system boot or user login.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-41397Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32054Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-31990Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32013Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-41364Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-22180Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-32020Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-62189Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-43570Same product: Openclaw Openclaw
CVE-2026-35632Same product: Openclaw Openclaw

Affected Assets

openclaw
openclaw
≤ 2026.2.22

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.4.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Proper enforcement of access authorizations on the resolved target resource stops a link from reaching an unintended object.

Least-privilege limits the damage an attacker can cause after following an unintended link.

Validating file-name inputs can reject or canonicalize names that resolve to links before access occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require code to validate paths and avoid unsafe link following.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect link-following flaws before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can mandate link-resolution checks and canonicalization before file access.

prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly require safe handling of symbolic links and path traversal.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include input validation and safe file-access design patterns.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address canonicalization and symlink attacks during implementation.

mitigates

Access-control rules can limit which files are reachable, reducing exposure to malicious links.

References