Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-32589

Access Control in Redhat Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift 2.0

Published
08 April 2026
Modified
12 August 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0024 16th percentile
Risk Priority 52 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-32589 is a high-severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) vulnerability in Redhat Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-32589 is a vulnerability in Red Hat Quay's container image upload process, classified under CWE-639 (Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key). It enables interference with concurrent image uploads across the registry. The issue was published on 2026-04-08 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L), indicating high severity due to its network accessibility, low complexity, and scope change.

An authenticated attacker with push access to any repository on the Red Hat Quay registry can exploit this flaw to target in-progress image uploads by other users, including those in repositories to which the attacker lacks access. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to read, modify, or cancel these uploads, potentially disrupting operations or compromising image integrity.

Mitigation details and patches are documented in the Red Hat security advisory at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32589 and the associated Bugzilla entry at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2446963. Security practitioners should consult these resources for version-specific remediation guidance.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's container image upload process. An authenticated user with push access to any repository on the registry can interfere with image uploads in progress by other users, including those in repositories they do…

more

not have access to. This could allow the attacker to read, modify, or cancel another user's in-progress image upload.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-2377Same product: Redhat Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift
CVE-2026-32591Same product: Redhat Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift
CVE-2026-32590Same product: Redhat Mirror Registry For Red Hat Openshift
CVE-2023-4959Same product: Redhat Quay
CVE-2026-9799Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-9087Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-14209Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-15945Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-4630Same vendor: Redhat
CVE-2026-37978Same vendor: Redhat

Affected Assets

redhat
mirror registry for red hat openshift
2.0, all versions
redhat
quay
3.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforcing approved authorizations on every access request structurally stops a user-controlled key from reaching another user's data.

Requiring explicit access-control decisions on each request blocks unauthorized key-driven access.

Least-privilege restrictions limit the scope of data reachable even if a key check is bypassed.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 full match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policy and least privilege directly blocks user-controlled key tampering that bypasses access checks.

PR.IR-01 mostly match
prevents

Logical access controls prevent unauthorized data access that results from missing authorization checks on object references.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing authorization checks but does not prevent the weakness in production.

prevents

Information access restriction explicitly enforces that users may only retrieve data they are authorized to see, directly addressing user-controlled key bypass.

prevents

Access control policy directly requires enforcement of authorization rules that prevent unauthorized access via manipulated keys.

prevents

Managing access rights includes ensuring users can only access their own records and not bypass authorization by altering identifiers.

mitigates

Privileged access rights control restricts what data each user may access, mitigating direct object reference attacks.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes authorization design but does not itself implement runtime access checks.

References