Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-3502

Trueconf ≤ 8.5.3.884

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD Exploited
Published
30 March 2026
Modified
03 April 2026
KEV Added
02 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
EPSS Score 0.058 92th percentile
Risk Priority 79 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-3502 is a high-severity Download of Code Without Integrity Check (CWE-494) vulnerability in Trueconf Trueconf. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Supply Chain Compromise (T1195); ranked in the top 8% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CM-14 (Signed Components) and SI-7 (Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

TrueConf Client is affected by a vulnerability in which the application downloads and applies update payloads without performing any integrity verification. This flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-3502 and assigned CWE-494, allows an attacker positioned to control or intercept the update delivery channel to supply a malicious payload that executes with the privileges of the updating process or user. The issue carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8.

An attacker with the ability to influence the update path, such as through network position or a compromised distribution server, can substitute a tampered binary. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution on the target system, potentially granting full control over the affected client installation.

The referenced TrueConf advisory describes remediation in version 8.5, while Check Point research details active exploitation of the flaw in campaigns against Southeast Asian government targets under the name Operation TrueChaos. The vulnerability is also listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, confirming observed in-the-wild use. The associated EPSS score has remained low and stable.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TrueConf Client downloads application update code and applies it without performing verification. An attacker who is able to influence the update delivery path can substitute a tampered update payload. If the payload is executed or installed by the updater, this…

more

may result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the updating process or user.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
02 April 2026

Related Threats

Threat-Actor AttributionAI

Operation TrueChaos
Checkpoint Research attributes 0-day exploitation of this TrueConf update flaw to Operation TrueChaos against SE Asian government targets.

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1195 Supply Chain Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate products or product delivery mechanisms prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
T1072 Software Deployment Tools Execution
Adversaries may gain access to and use centralized software suites installed within an enterprise to execute commands and move laterally through the network.
T1195.001 Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate software dependencies and development tools prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
T1195.002 Compromise Software Supply Chain Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate application software prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-66835Same product: Trueconf Trueconf
CVE-2025-15556Shared CWE-494both on KEV
CVE-2022-40799Shared CWE-494both on KEV
CVE-2021-44168Shared CWE-494both on KEV
CVE-2026-27180Shared CWE-494
CVE-2024-28850Shared CWE-494
CVE-2025-69263Shared CWE-494
CVE-2026-13433Shared CWE-494
CVE-2024-39348Shared CWE-494
CVE-2023-29401Shared CWE-494

Affected Assets

trueconf
trueconf
≤ 8.5.3.884

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 9 hardening rules · 5 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Requires digital signature verification before component installation, directly stopping execution of code downloaded without integrity checks.

Employs integrity verification tools that can identify missing or failed checks on downloaded software after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

ID.RA-09 full match
prevents

Directly requires assessing authenticity/integrity of software before acquisition and use, preventing unverified downloads.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Requires cryptographic integrity protections (signatures/hashes) for data-in-transit, covering downloaded code.

PR.PS-05 mostly match
prevents

Prevents execution of unauthorized software, blocking the outcome of an unchecked download.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Mandating integrity checks, digital signatures, and origin tracing for ICT components directly reduces the chance that code or firmware lacking an integrity check will be accepted into the organisation’s environment.

none

Requiring suppliers to disclose vulnerabilities and mandating verified updates lowers the chance that code lacking integrity checks will be deployed.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248575 OL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-494
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271524 OL 9 must check the GPG signature of software packages originating from external software repositories before installation. prevents CWE-494
RHEL 7 (2 rules)
  • V-204447 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-494
  • V-204448 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-494
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
  • V-230264 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-494
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-257820 RHEL 9 must check the GPG signature of software packages originating from external software repositories before installation. prevents CWE-494

References