Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-35347

Uutils Coreutils ≤ 0.6.0

Published
22 April 2026
Modified
27 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0014 3th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-35347 is a medium-severity Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) vulnerability in Uutils Coreutils. Its CVSS base score is 4.4 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-11 (Error Handling) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The comm utility in uutils coreutils incorrectly consumes data from non-regular file inputs before performing comparison operations. The are_files_identical function opens and reads from both input paths to compare content without first verifying if the paths refer to regular files.…

more

If an input path is a FIFO or a pipe, this pre-read operation drains the stream, leading to silent data loss before the actual comparison logic is executed. Additionally, the utility may hang indefinitely if it attempts to pre-read from infinite streams like /dev/zero.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

Insufficient information to map techniques.
Confidence: LOW · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-35369Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35380Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35377Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35358Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35343Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35366Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35373Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35341Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35372Same product: Uutils Coreutils
CVE-2026-35368Same product: Uutils Coreutils

Affected Assets

uutils
coreutils
≤ 0.6.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces validation of input file types (regular files vs. pipes/FIFOs/infinite streams) before any read operations, preventing the data-loss and hang conditions.

detectrespond

Requires graceful error handling for invalid or problematic inputs, surfacing the non-regular-file condition instead of silent consumption or indefinite blocking.

respondrecover

Mandates timely patching of the identified input-validation flaw in the comm utility once a corrected version is available.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require and enforce input validation during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Testing against a defined set of requirements and using code review plus vulnerability scanning forces validation of inputs and handling of unanticipated conditions, reducing the chance that malformed data will be accepted.

prevents

Secure-coding guidelines and mandatory security testing (including code scans) compel developers to validate and sanitize inputs at design and implementation time, lowering the incidence of malformed or malicious data reaching downstream components.

prevents

Mandating input controls that include integrity checks and input validation ensures that untrusted data is examined before use, blocking the root cause of many injection and malformed-data weaknesses.

prevents

Security-by-design principles explicitly call for data validation and sanitization at every layer, reducing the chance that malformed or malicious input will be processed without scrutiny.

prevents

Requiring language-specific secure coding standards, peer review, SAST and documented mitigation of common programming errors forces validation of all inputs before they are trusted.

none

Regular automated validation of system software and data content, combined with scanning of all inbound files, enforces input validation at the boundary before untrusted content is processed.

References