Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-35463

RCE in Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng ≤ 0.5.0b3.dev96

Published
07 April 2026
Modified
24 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0081 54th percentile
Risk Priority 65 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-35463 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-35463 is a vulnerability in pyLoad, a free and open-source download manager written in Python, affecting versions 0.5.0b3.dev96 and earlier. The issue arises from the ADMIN_ONLY_OPTIONS protection mechanism, which limits access to security-critical configuration values—such as reconnect scripts, SSL certificates, and proxy credentials—to admin-only users. However, this safeguard applies only to core config options and excludes plugin config options. Specifically, the AntiVirus plugin stores an executable path (avfile) in its configuration, which is passed directly to subprocess.Popen() without additional validation.

A non-admin user with SETTINGS permission can exploit this by modifying the AntiVirus plugin's avfile path, enabling remote code execution via OS command injection (CWE-78). The attack requires low privileges over the network with low complexity and no user interaction (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8), allowing the attacker to achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts on the affected system.

The pyLoad GitHub repository details mitigation in commit c4cf995a2803bdbe388addfc2b0f323277efc0e1 and security advisory GHSA-w48f-wwwf-f5fr, published on 2026-04-07.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

pyLoad is a free and open-source download manager written in Python. In 0.5.0b3.dev96 and earlier, the ADMIN_ONLY_OPTIONS protection mechanism restricts security-critical configuration values (reconnect scripts, SSL certs, proxy credentials) to admin-only access. However, this protection is only applied to core…

more

config options, not to plugin config options. The AntiVirus plugin stores an executable path (avfile) in its config, which is passed directly to subprocess.Popen(). A non-admin user with SETTINGS permission can change this path to achieve remote code execution.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-42315Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-35187Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-42314Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-35459Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-35592Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2025-54802Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2024-22416Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-29778Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-40594Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng
CVE-2026-35586Same product: Pyload-Ng Project Pyload-Ng

Affected Assets

pyload-ng project
pyload-ng
≤ 0.5.0b3.dev96

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References