Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-35576 is a high-severity Cross-site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in Churchcrm Churchcrm. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Browser Session Hijacking (T1185); ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-35576 is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability, classified under CWE-79, affecting ChurchCRM, an open-source church management system, in versions prior to 7.0.0. The flaw resides in the Person Property Management subsystem, where dynamically assigned person properties fail to sanitize input, allowing injection of arbitrary JavaScript code. This issue persists even in versions previously patched for CVE-2023-38766, earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).
An authenticated user with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by injecting a malicious payload into a person property, which is then persistently stored in the database. When other users, including administrators, view the affected person's profile or access its printable view, the payload executes in their browsers, potentially enabling session hijacking, theft of sensitive data, or full account compromise due to the cross-origin scope change.
ChurchCRM addresses this vulnerability in version 7.0.0. Security practitioners should upgrade to this release immediately. Relevant advisories and patch details are available in the GitHub security advisory at https://github.com/ChurchCRM/CRM/security/advisories/GHSA-8r36-fvxj-26qv and the fixing pull request at https://github.com/ChurchCRM/CRM/pull/8016.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-19774
Vulnerability Data
ChurchCRM is an open-source church management system. Prior to 7.0.0, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in ChurchCRM within the Person Property Management subsystem. This issue persists in versions patched for CVE-2023-38766 and allows an authenticated user to inject…
more
arbitrary JavaScript code via dynamically assigned person properties. The malicious payload is persistently stored and executed when other users view the affected person profile or access the printable view, potentially leading to session hijacking or full account compromise. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.0.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.2V1.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect input neutralization through targeted web-application tests.
Input validation directly enforces neutralization of untrusted data before it reaches web output generation.
Output filtering can catch or sanitize unneutralized script content before it is served to users.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).
Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Knowledge exchange on emerging attack techniques and patches reduces the likelihood that cross-site scripting flaws remain unaddressed in deployed applications.
Operational indicators of compromise for web-application attacks can be incorporated into WAF or input-filtering rules, lowering the likelihood that unsanitized data reaches the browser.
Requiring language-specific secure-coding standards and automated scanning during the SDLC catches missing output encoding or improper neutralization of untrusted data before the software reaches production.
Secure-coding standards, SAST scans and removal of insecure code samples together eliminate the failure to neutralize script content that produces cross-site scripting flaws.
Secure-coding testing and automated code-analysis tools are applied to detect improper neutralization of script-related content during web-page generation.