Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-39312

Softethervpn ≤ 5.2.5188

Public PoC
Published
07 April 2026
Modified
14 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0045 37th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-39312 is a high-severity Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value (CWE-789) vulnerability in Softether Softethervpn. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-39312 is a pre-authentication denial-of-service vulnerability affecting SoftEther VPN Developer Edition version 5.2.5188 and likely earlier versions of the Developer Edition. SoftEtherVPN is an open-source cross-platform multi-protocol VPN program. The flaw resides in the vpnserver process, which can be crashed by processing a malformed EAP-TLS packet sent over raw L2TP on UDP port 1701.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by transmitting a single malformed EAP-TLS packet, resulting in the vpnserver process termination and disruption of all active VPN sessions. The CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) reflects network accessibility, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and high availability impact with no confidentiality or integrity effects. It maps to CWE-789.

Mitigation details are available in the SoftEtherVPN security advisory published on GitHub at https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/security/advisories/GHSA-q5g3-qhc6-pr3h.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

SoftEtherVPN is a an open-source cross-platform multi-protocol VPN Program. In 5.2.5188 and earlier, a pre-authentication denial-of-service vulnerability exists in SoftEther VPN Developer Edition 5.2.5188 (and likely earlier versions of Developer Edition). An unauthenticated remote attacker can crash the vpnserver process…

more

by sending a single malformed EAP-TLS packet over raw L2TP (UDP/1701), terminating all active VPN sessions.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-25566Same vendor: Softether
CVE-2023-22325Same vendor: Softether
CVE-2021-47970Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-46603Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-69219Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-70377Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-55380Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-53916Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-47319Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-59646Shared CWE-789

Affected Assets

softether
softethervpn
≤ 5.2.5188

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly rejects or bounds untrusted size values before any allocation occurs.

Resource quotas and priority allocation limit the system-wide impact of an oversized request.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent coding flaws that trust unvalidated size values for allocations.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect and block excessive allocation flaws before deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and size checks that prevent unbounded allocations.

prevents

Application security requirements mandate bounds checking on size parameters to avoid excessive memory allocation.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require resource-limit enforcement that mitigates uncontrolled memory requests.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit allocating memory from untrusted size values without validation.

References