Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-41665

Memory Safety in Samsung One ≤ 1.30.0

Published
22 April 2026
Modified
27 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0014 4th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-41665 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Samsung One. Its CVSS base score is 6.1 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Integer overflow in scratch buffer initialization size calculation in Samsung Open Source ONE cause incorrect memory initialization for large intermediate tensors. Affected version is prior to commit 1.30.0.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

Insufficient information to map techniques.
Confidence: LOW · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-41666Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-40450Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-40448Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-41664Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-40449Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-41667Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2026-6839Same product: Samsung One
CVE-2023-42562Same vendor: Samsung
CVE-2023-40218Same vendor: Samsung
CVE-2023-42563Same vendor: Samsung

Affected Assets

samsung
one
≤ 1.30.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires applying the vendor patch (commit 1.30.0) that corrects the integer-overflow calculation for scratch-buffer sizes.

prevent

Mandates developer security testing and static analysis capable of detecting integer overflows in tensor-size arithmetic before release.

prevent

Enforces memory-protection mechanisms that can contain or abort execution when an overflow produces an invalid allocation or initialization.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References