CVE-2026-42428
Openclaw ≤ 2026.4.8
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-42428 is a high-severity Missing Support for Integrity Check (CWE-353) vulnerability in Openclaw Openclaw. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Component Firmware (T1542.002); ranked at the 4th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-42428 is a vulnerability in OpenClaw versions before 2026.4.8 that fails to enforce integrity verification on downloaded plugin archives, corresponding to CWE-353 (Missing Support for Integrity Check). This flaw allows attackers to install malicious or tampered plugin packages without detection, compromising the local assistant environment. The issue was published on 2026-04-28 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H).
The attack requires network access, high complexity, low privileges on the target system, and user interaction, such as a user approving a plugin download and installation. An attacker with low privileges can supply tampered plugin archives, which the software accepts without verifying integrity, leading to high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability within the local assistant environment.
Advisories recommend upgrading to OpenClaw version 2026.4.8, where the issue is fixed via commit d7c3210cd6f5fdfdc1beff4c9541673e814354d5. Further details on the vulnerability and remediation are provided in the GitHub security advisory at https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-3vvq-q2qc-7rmp and the VulnCheck advisory at https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-missing-integrity-verification-in-package-downloads.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-26130
Vulnerability Data
OpenClaw versions before 2026.4.8 fail to enforce integrity verification on downloaded plugin archives. Attackers can install malicious or tampered plugin packages without detection, compromising the local assistant environment.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 6 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
V12.1.1V17.2.2V17.2.5V17.2.8
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SC-8 directly requires mechanisms to protect integrity of transmitted data, which structurally eliminates the missing checksum weakness in protocols.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Directly requires integrity protection for data-in-transit via checksums or equivalent mechanisms.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Cryptographic controls can provide integrity verification for transmitted data.
Network security controls can mandate integrity mechanisms on transmission protocols.
Security requirements for network services can require integrity checks on data in transit.
Application security requirements can specify integrity checks for data transmission.
Secure architecture principles can mandate integrity protection for communications.
Secure coding standards can require integrity verification mechanisms in protocols.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (3 rules)
- V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-353
- V-248827 OL 8 must not have the rsh-server package installed. prevents CWE-353
- V-248823 OL 8 must not have the telnet-server package installed. prevents CWE-353
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
- V-230487 RHEL 8 must not have the telnet-server package installed. prevents CWE-353