Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-43096

DoS in Linux Kernel 6.19 – 6.19.14

Published
06 May 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0011 1th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-43096 is a medium-severity Infinite Loop (CWE-835) vulnerability in Linux Linux Kernel. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mshv: Fix infinite fault loop on permission-denied GPA intercepts Prevent infinite fault loops when guests access memory regions without proper permissions. Currently, mshv_handle_gpa_intercept() attempts to remap pages for all faults…

more

on movable memory regions, regardless of whether the access type is permitted. When a guest writes to a read-only region, the remap succeeds but the region remains read-only, causing immediate re-fault and spinning the vCPU indefinitely. Validate intercept access type against region permissions before attempting remaps. Reject writes to non-writable regions and executes to non-executable regions early, returning false to let the VMM handle the intercept appropriately. This also closes a potential DoS vector where malicious guests could intentionally trigger these fault loops to consume host resources.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
Why these techniques?

Vulnerability in hypervisor GPA intercept handling allows malicious guest VM to trigger infinite vCPU fault loops, directly enabling application/system DoS via exploitation of the flaw.

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-23451Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-71267Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-53312Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-45919Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-31642Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-23109Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-31498Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-23082Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-43486Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-46314Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

linux
linux kernel
7.0 · 6.19 — 6.19.14

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly enforces memory-region permissions on GPA intercepts so that writes to read-only or executes to non-executable regions are rejected before any remap attempt, eliminating the infinite fault loop.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules between guest and host memory regions by validating access type against region attributes, preventing unauthorized flows that trigger repeated faults.

prevent

Applies memory-protection techniques that restrict unauthorized read/write/execute operations on GPA regions, stopping the permission-mismatch condition that produces the unbounded loop.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (reviews, testing, static analysis) directly prevent introduction of infinite-loop defects.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Static analysis and vuln scanning during asset assessment can detect unreachable loop exits.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can uncover infinite-loop conditions before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that can detect and prevent infinite-loop defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify loop-termination rules, indirectly reducing the weakness.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address loop termination and prevent infinite loops.

none

Secure architecture principles encourage designs that avoid unreachable exit conditions.

none

Change management can require review of loop logic when code is modified.

References