Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-44600

Torproject Tor ≤ 0.4.9.7

Published
07 May 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0038 31th percentile
Risk Priority 32 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-44600 is a low-severity Incorrect Behavior Order (CWE-696) vulnerability in Torproject Tor. Its CVSS base score is 3.7 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 31th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and RA-5 (Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Tor before 0.4.9.7 mishandles accounting of the conflux out-of-order queue during the clearing of a queue, aka TROVE-2026-010.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-44599Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2026-44597Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2026-44603Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2026-44602Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2026-44601Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2023-23589Same product: Torproject Tor
CVE-2026-14169Shared CWE-696
CVE-2025-0150Shared CWE-696
CVE-2026-43002Shared CWE-696
CVE-2025-55114Shared CWE-696

Affected Assets

torproject
tor
≤ 0.4.9.7

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation at post-design stages can discover incorrect ordering of related behaviors before deployment.

Vulnerability scanning may surface order-related weaknesses after code is built but does not address their root cause.

Mandating a documented development process and standards enforces review of behavior ordering within the software lifecycle.

Security and privacy engineering principles applied during design and implementation directly require correct sequencing of operations to avoid introducing order-dependent flaws.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce correct sequencing of security-relevant operations during design and coding.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect ordering flaws but does not prevent them during development.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates correct sequencing of security activities, directly preventing incorrect behavior order.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require proper ordering of design and implementation steps.

prevents

Secure coding standards enforce correct execution order of security-critical operations.

References