Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-45022

Go-Git Project Go-Git ≤ 5.19.0

Published
27 May 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0016 6th percentile
Risk Priority 27 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-45022 is a high-severity Incorrect Behavior Order: Validate Before Canonicalize (CWE-180) vulnerability in Go-Git Project Go-Git. Its CVSS base score is 7.0 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Mark-of-the-Web Bypass (T1553.005); ranked at the 6th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A08:2025 Software or Data Integrity Failures

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

go-git is an extensible git implementation library written in pure Go. Prior to 5.19.0 and 6.0.0-alpha.3, go-git may parse malformed Git objects in a way that differs from upstream Git. When commit or tag objects contain ambiguous or malformed headers,…

more

go-git’s decoded representation may expose values differently from how Git itself would interpret or reject the same object. Additionally, go-git’s commit signing and verification logic operates over commit data reconstructed from go-git’s parsed representation rather than the original raw object bytes. As a result, go-git may sign or verify a commit payload that is not byte-for-byte equivalent to the object stored in the repository. This can cause a signature to appear valid for a commit whose displayed or effective metadata differs from the object that was intended to be signed. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.19.0 and 6.0.0-alpha.3.

CWE(s)
CWE-180CWE-345

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1553.005 Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Defense Impairment
Adversaries may abuse specific file formats to subvert Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW) controls.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195 Supply Chain Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate products or product delivery mechanisms prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195.001 Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate software dependencies and development tools prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195.002 Compromise Software Supply Chain Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate application software prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1542.002 Component Firmware Stealth
Adversaries may modify component firmware to persist on systems.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-25934Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2026-33762Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2026-45571Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2023-49569Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2026-45570Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2023-49568Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2026-34165Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2025-21614Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2026-41506Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git
CVE-2025-21613Same product: Go-Git Project Go-Git

Affected Assets

go-git project
go-git
6.0.0 · ≤ 5.19.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 8 hardening rules · 5 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.8
  • V1.1.1
  • V12.1.3
  • V3.5.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-23 Session Authenticity good match

Explicit requirement to protect session authenticity structurally prevents the weakness for communications.

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

SA-11 requires developer testing and evaluation that can discover validation-order defects after they have been coded.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

SI-10 requires validity checks on inputs; when implemented with canonicalization preceding validation it structurally prevents the exact ordering flaw.

SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity good match

Integrity verification tools detect (but do not stop) the acceptance of data lacking authenticity.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

SA-8 mandates security engineering principles that include correct canonicalization-before-validation ordering for input handling.

SC-13 Cryptographic Protection partial match

Cryptographic mechanisms can be used to verify authenticity, thereby preventing acceptance of invalid data.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require correct validation order after canonicalization to prevent bypasses.

RC.RP-05 mostly match
degrades

CWE-345 directly impairs RC.RP-05's verification of restored-asset integrity/authenticity, largely defeating the outcome while still leaving other restoration-confirmation steps partially viable.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect validation-order defects before deployment.

A.8.20 Networks security partial match
mitigates

Network controls can enforce authenticated channels, reducing risk of accepting unauthentic data.

A.8.21 Security of network services partial match
mitigates

Secure network services often include authenticity checks for data exchanged over those services.

A.8.24 Use of cryptography partial match
prevents

Cryptographic mechanisms directly verify data origin and integrity, preventing acceptance of unauthentic data.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and canonicalization order, directly addressing CWE-180.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements include proper input handling to prevent validation-before-canonicalization flaws.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (2 rules)
  • V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
  • V-248575 OL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271525 OL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. prevents CWE-345
RHEL 7 (2 rules)
  • V-204447 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
  • V-204448 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
RHEL 8 (2 rules)
  • V-230264 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
  • V-230265 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-257822 RHEL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. prevents CWE-345

References