Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-48840

Exim 4.88 – 4.99.4

Published
30 May 2026
Modified
22 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0026 18th percentile
Risk Priority 43 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-48840 is a medium-severity Numeric Range Comparison Without Minimum Check (CWE-839) vulnerability in Exim Exim. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Exim 4.88 before 4.99.4, in some proxy configurations, mishandles certain short payloads, leading to disclosure of uninitialized stack memory values to a client.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-67896Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2026-66140Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2026-40684Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2023-42119Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2024-39929Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2020-28018Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2025-30232Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2026-45185Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2026-40687Same product: Exim Exim
CVE-2023-42115Same product: Exim Exim

Affected Assets

exim
exim
4.88 — 4.99.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SI-10 requires validity checks on information inputs, directly stopping missing lower-bound range verification from being introduced.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and range checks that prevent missing minimum bounds.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect missing minimum checks through boundary-value and fuzz testing.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and boundary checks that would catch missing minimum-range verification.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit validation rules for numeric ranges, directly addressing the missing minimum check.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles require defensive input handling and range validation to prevent out-of-bounds values.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid numeric comparisons that omit the lower bound, directly mitigating CWE-839.

References