CVE-2026-5080
Perldancer Dancer\ \
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-5080 is a medium-severity PRNG (CWE-338) vulnerability in Perldancer Dancer\. Its CVSS base score is 5.9 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Forge Web Credentials (T1606); ranked at the 29th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SC-12 (Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-26369
Vulnerability Data
Dancer::Session::Abstract versions through 1.3522 for Perl generates session ids insecurely. The session id is generated from summing the character codepoints of the absolute pathname with the process id, the epoch time and calls to the built-in rand() function to return…
more
a number between 0 and 999-billion, and concatenating that result three times. The path name might be known or guessed by an attacker, especially for applications known to be written using Dancer with standard installation locations. The epoch time can be guessed by an attacker, and may be leaked in the HTTP header. The process id comes from a small set of numbers, and workers may have sequential process ids. The built-in rand() function is seeded with 32-bits and is considered unsuitable for security applications. Predictable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 9 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
V7.2.3V11.5.1V11.3.4
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Requiring specific approved cryptography for protection directly mandates use of strong PRNGs instead of weak ones.
Developer testing and evaluation can discover predictable number generation through targeted analysis or fuzzing of identifier creation routines.
Cryptographic key establishment and management mandates proper entropy and randomness during generation, directly stopping predictable identifiers at the source.
Authenticator management requires secure initial distribution and handling of authenticators, structurally preventing predictable values from being usable.
Engineering principles applied during design and development include selection of cryptographically strong random number generation.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices explicitly require cryptographically strong RNG selection and usage in security contexts.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mandates use of approved cryptographic controls, directly requiring cryptographically strong RNGs.
Security testing can detect use of weak random number generators.
Secure SDLC processes should catch weak PRNG usage during design and code review.
Application security requirements can specify cryptographically strong random number generation.
Secure engineering principles include selection of appropriate cryptographic primitives.
Secure coding standards prohibit use of weak PRNGs in security contexts.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (3 rules)
- V-248524 OL 8 must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography for the following: To provision digital signatures, to generate cryptographic hashes, and to protect data requiring data-at-rest protections in accordance with applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards. prevents CWE-340
- V-248563 The OL 8 SSH server must be configured to use strong entropy. prevents CWE-338
- V-248600 OL 8 must have the packages required to use the hardware random number generator entropy gatherer service. prevents CWE-340
RHEL 7 (1 rule)
- V-204497 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography for the following: to provision digital signatures, to generate cryptographic hashes, and to protect data requiring data-at-rest protections in accordance with applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards. prevents CWE-340
RHEL 8 (2 rules)
- V-230253 RHEL 8 must ensure the SSH server uses strong entropy. prevents CWE-338
- V-244527 RHEL 8 must have the packages required to use the hardware random number generator entropy gatherer service. prevents CWE-340
Ubuntu 22.04 (1 rule)
- V-260650 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography to protect classified information and for the following: To provision digital signatures, to generate cryptographic hashes, and to protect unclassified information requiring confidentiality and cryptographic protection in accordance with applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards. prevents CWE-338