CVE-2026-54798
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2026-54798 is a high-severity Active Debug Code (CWE-489) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and CM-7 (Least Functionality) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-42593
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability has been identified in CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication (All versions < V26.20), SICORE Base system (All versions < V26.20.0). The affected application includes a debugging interface that is accessible through HTTP endpoints. This could allow an authenticated attacker to…
more
disrupt the system by crashing the web process causing denial of service conditions.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI
Why these techniques?
The vulnerability exposes a debugging interface via HTTP endpoints in a publicly accessible application, directly enabling exploitation of a public-facing service (T1190) that can be abused by an authenticated attacker to crash the web process and cause denial of service.
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Access Enforcement directly blocks unauthorized or unintended use of the exposed debugging HTTP endpoints that enable the authenticated DoS attack.
Least Functionality requires disabling or removing non-essential debugging interfaces, eliminating the attack surface described in the CVE.
Boundary Protection can restrict or filter access to the debugging endpoints at the network perimeter, reducing exposure even for authenticated users.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require removal of debug code before release, covering most of this weakness while the control addresses many other development issues.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance catches active debug code before deployment.
Configuration management can disable or remove debug features through hardened baselines.
Secure development life cycle mandates removal of debug code before release.
Secure coding standards explicitly prohibit leaving debug code active in production.
Separation of environments reduces risk of debug code reaching production but does not directly address its removal.
Change management can enforce removal of debug code as part of release gates.