Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-59638

Bouncycastle Bctls-Fips 1.0.0 – 1.0.24

Published
03 August 2026
Modified
28 August 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 9.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:Amber
EPSS Score 0.0021 12th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-59638 is a critical-severity Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch (CWE-297) vulnerability in Bouncycastle Bctls-Fips. Its CVSS base score is 9.3 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557); ranked at the 12th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-23 (Session Authenticity) and SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, JSSE hostname verifier CN-fallback enabled by default despite documented opt-in. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bctls-fips 1.0.24 (1.0.X series),…

more

2.0.24 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.24 (2.1.X series).

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
T1557.001 Name Resolution Poisoning and SMB Relay Credential Access
By responding to LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS network traffic, adversaries may spoof an authoritative source for name resolution to force communication with an adversary controlled system.
T1557.002 ARP Cache Poisoning Credential Access
Adversaries may poison Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) caches to position themselves between the communication of two or more networked devices.
T1557.003 DHCP Spoofing Credential Access
Adversaries may redirect network traffic to adversary-owned systems by spoofing Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) traffic and acting as a malicious DHCP server on the victim network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-59646Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-58062Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-8763Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-59651Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-14682Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-12816Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-12860Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-12803Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-59650Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java
CVE-2026-12185Same product: Bouncycastle Bc-Java

Affected Assets

bouncycastle
bc-java
≤ 1.85
bouncycastle
bctls-fips
1.0.0 — 1.0.24 · 2.0.19 — 2.0.24 · 2.1.20 — 2.1.24
bouncycastle
bouncy castle for java lts
≤ 2.73.11

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.2.8

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Protecting session authenticity structurally requires proper certificate validation to bind the presented certificate to the intended host.

Requiring confidentiality and integrity of transmitted data necessitates correct TLS certificate validation with host-name checking.

Security engineering principles require correct implementation of certificate validation (including hostname matching) when cryptography is used.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Server/service authentication via certificates directly requires correct host validation.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

Protecting data-in-transit integrity depends on proper certificate validation to prevent MITM.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure development practices include coding correct certificate validation logic.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Network security controls include certificate validation and host-name verification to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.

degrades

Security of network services requires proper TLS configuration and certificate validation for service endpoints.

prevents

Use of cryptography mandates correct implementation of certificate validation and hostname verification.

prevents

Application security requirements include secure communication and certificate validation for external services.

mitigates

Secure system architecture principles require proper certificate validation to protect communications.

prevents

Secure coding practices include implementing proper certificate and hostname validation in code.

References