Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-66839

Published
05 August 2026
Modified
28 August 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0014 3th percentile
Risk Priority 25 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-66839 is a high-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Co (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 3th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

NetKids iMark, provided by Integrated Systems Technologies, Inc., contains an Unquoted Search Path or Element vulnerability (CWE-428). An authenticated attacker may exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-57699Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-2644Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-14018Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-34768Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-53912Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37102Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-31747Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-58400Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-36384Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-25865Shared CWE-428

Affected Assets

Co
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.

Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.

degrades

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.

degrades

Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.

References