Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-67207

Public PoC
Published
30 July 2026
Modified
31 July 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0030 23th percentile
Risk Priority 38 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-67207 is a high-severity Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027); ranked at the 23th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and AC-25 (Reference Monitor) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Wolf CMS through 0.8.3.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in BackupRestoreController that allows authenticated non-administrative users to access restricted backup functionality due to a PHP operator precedence flaw in the permission check expression. Attackers can exploit the incorrect evaluation of…

more

the access control expression to create, download, and restore backups without administrative privileges.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1027 Obfuscated Files or Information Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to make an executable or file difficult to discover or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2020-8864Shared CWE-697
CVE-2026-48032Shared CWE-697
CVE-2023-23845Shared CWE-697
CVE-2024-41958Shared CWE-697
CVE-2026-34210Shared CWE-697
CVE-2025-54336Shared CWE-697
CVE-2026-14686Shared CWE-697
CVE-2023-46658Shared CWE-697
CVE-2024-9681Shared CWE-697
CVE-2026-34574Shared CWE-697

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation directly exercises security-relevant comparisons to discover incorrect logic.

A reference monitor must be small and correct, structurally limiting the chance of flawed comparison logic in authorization decisions.

Security engineering principles require correct implementation of comparison logic used for access and authentication decisions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure development practices directly require correct logic for security comparisons and thereby prevent this class of flaw.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect comparison logic.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate correct comparison logic for security decisions.

prevents

Secure architecture principles can require robust comparison mechanisms for access decisions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address avoiding incorrect comparison operators and logic.

finds

Security testing can detect incorrect comparison flaws before deployment.

degrades

Secure authentication mechanisms rely on correct comparison of credentials or tokens.

References