Security Resilience

CVE-2026-85446

DoS in Mit Moos-Ivp ≤ 24.8.1

Public PoCDoS
Published
03 September 2026
Modified
14 October 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0078 55th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-85446 is a high-severity Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity (CWE-407) vulnerability in Mit Moos-Ivp. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, ranked in the top 45% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

MOOS-IvP versions through 24.8.1 contain a quadratic processing vulnerability in uFldNodeComms where each new node identity creates a ledger entry and triggers all-pairs distribution work. Attackers can supply unbounded distinct node names in reports to drive the shoreside broker into…

more

quadratic processing, delaying or preventing distribution of legitimate node reports.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-85435Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85444Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85449Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85445Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85438Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85448Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85429Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85439Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85447Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp
CVE-2026-85425Same product: Mit Moos-Ivp

Affected Assets

mit
moos-ivp
≤ 24.8.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Denial-of-service protection directly reduces the impact of resource exhaustion triggered by worst-case algorithmic inputs.

Resource availability allocation limits blast radius when an inefficient algorithm is forced into its worst case.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can uncover performance issues stemming from algorithmic complexity.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify anomalous resource consumption indicative of algorithmic complexity attacks.

prevents

Secure coding practices can include guidelines to avoid or mitigate inefficient algorithms.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-407, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References