Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-86435

DoS

Public PoCDoS
Published
07 September 2026
Modified
08 October 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0049 40th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-86435 is a high-severity Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity (CWE-407) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

commonmark versions from 1.5.0 before 2.8.4 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the Footnote extension that fails to deduplicate footnote definitions. Attackers can craft documents with duplicate footnote definitions and references to create quadratic output expansion, consuming excessive memory…

more

and CPU to exhaust server resources.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-64460Shared CWE-407
CVE-2025-12084Shared CWE-407
CVE-2023-4408Shared CWE-407
CVE-2025-58187Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-28804Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-71418Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-13311Shared CWE-407
CVE-2024-29916Shared CWE-407
CVE-2026-48511Shared CWE-407
CVE-2025-23020Shared CWE-407

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Denial-of-service protection directly reduces the impact of resource exhaustion triggered by worst-case algorithmic inputs.

Resource availability allocation limits blast radius when an inefficient algorithm is forced into its worst case.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Redundancy of processing facilities can absorb resource exhaustion from inefficient algorithms.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify anomalous resource consumption indicative of algorithmic complexity attacks.

blocks

Secure development life cycle includes design reviews that can catch inefficient algorithms before deployment.

blocks

Secure system architecture principles encourage selection of algorithms with acceptable worst-case complexity.

prevents

Secure coding practices can include guidelines to avoid or mitigate inefficient algorithms.

finds

Security testing can uncover performance issues stemming from algorithmic complexity.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-407, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References