Cyber Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-1039Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations in Automated Recognition Mechanism

Abstraction: Class · CVEs in our corpus: 5

The product uses an automated mechanism such as machine learning to recognize complex data inputs (e.g. image or audio) as a particular concept or category, but it does not properly detect or handle inputs that have been modified or constructed in a way that causes the mechanism to detect a different, incorrect concept.

When techniques such as machine learning are used to automatically classify input streams, and those classifications are used for security-critical decisions, then any mistake in classification can introduce a vulnerability that allows attackers to cause the product to make the wrong security decision or disrupt service of the automated mechanism. If the mechanism is not developed or "trained" with enough input data or has not adequately undergone test and evaluation, then attackers may be able to craft malicious inputs that intentionally trigger the incorrect classification. Targeted technologies include, but are not necessarily limited to: For example, an attacker might modify road signs or road surface markings to trick autonomous vehicles into misreading the sign/marking and performing a dangerous action. Another example includes an attacker that crafts highly specific and complex prompts to "jailbreak" a chatbot to bypass safety or privacy mechanisms, better known as prompt injection attacks.

Mapped by Cyber Resilience. This is an AI-native weakness the NVD catalog almost never assigns. We mapped 2 CVEs to it ourselves — a language-model classifier reads each CVE description and proposes the weakness, human-reviewed before it surfaces, with model poisoning and extraction cases deliberately routed to MITRE ATLAS rather than a synthetic CWE. The mappings are additive; NVD records are unchanged. Rows tagged CR below are ours.

Last updated: 20 August 2026 13:14 UTC

Control responseHuman-reviewed

Answering this weakness across the control lifecycle, from our framework cross-walks.

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53 / CSF Protect)
  • PR.PS-06
  • ID.RA-03
  • SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation
  • SI-4 System Monitoring
Detect
Catch it (CSF Detect / Respond)
  • DE.CM-09
Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (0)AI-assisted

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
No NIST controls proposed yet.

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2019-8760 CR5.16.80.00312019-12-18
CVE-2026-22773 CR5.16.50.00412026-01-10
CVE-2023-20071 4.65.80.00522023-11-01
CVE-2025-26644 4.25.10.00532025-04-08