CWE · MITRE source
CWE-472External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter
The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable, such as hidden form fields.
If a web product does not properly protect assumed-immutable values from modification in hidden form fields, parameters, cookies, or URLs, this can lead to modification of critical data. Web applications often mistakenly make the assumption that data passed to the client in hidden fields or cookies is not susceptible to tampering. Improper validation of data that are user-controllable can lead to the application processing incorrect, and often malicious, input. For example, custom cookies commonly store session data or persistent data across sessions. This kind of session data is normally involved in security related decisions on the server side, such as user authentication and access control. Thus, the cookies might contain sensitive data such as user credentials and privileges. This is a dangerous practice, as it can often lead to improper reliance on the value of the client-provided cookie by the server side application.
Last updated: 20 August 2026 13:14 UTC
Cumulative inbound coverage
How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.
Collective: partial · 4 mapping(s) from 1 framework(s): CAPEC 4 (partial)
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
This weakness contributes to A06:2025 Insecure Design.
Control responseHuman-reviewed
Answering this weakness across the control lifecycle, from our framework cross-walks.
—
—
—
NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (0)AI-assisted
| Control | Title | Family | Why it addresses this CWE |
|---|---|---|---|
| No NIST controls proposed yet. | |||
Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority
| CVE | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | Published |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-25153 UPD | 9.1 | 9.8 | 0.4174 | 2024-03-13 |
CVE-2021-1293 UPD | 8.0 | 9.8 | 0.0542 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1289 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0424 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1290 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0424 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1291 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0424 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1292 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0418 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1294 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0452 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2021-1295 UPD | 7.9 | 9.8 | 0.0424 | 2021-02-04 |
CVE-2025-35939 KEV UPD | 7.5 | 5.3 | 0.0132 | 2025-05-07 |
CVE-2017-5260 UPD | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.0813 | 2017-12-20 |
CVE-2017-5261 UPD | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.0889 | 2017-12-20 |
CVE-2025-6191 UPD | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.0982 | 2025-06-18 |
CVE-2025-7656 UPD | 7.4 | 8.8 | 0.0913 | 2025-07-15 |
CVE-2025-43930 UPD | 7.3 | 9.8 | 0.0046 | 2025-07-07 |
CVE-2025-10891 | 7.3 | 8.8 | 0.0661 | 2025-09-24 |
CVE-2025-43933 UPD | 7.2 | 9.8 | 0.0037 | 2025-07-07 |
CVE-2026-34751 UPD | 6.8 | 9.1 | 0.0031 | 2026-04-01 |
CVE-2024-7025 UPD | 6.7 | 8.8 | 0.0069 | 2024-11-27 |
CVE-2026-11088 UPD | 6.7 | 9.6 | 0.0032 | 2026-06-04 |
CVE-2026-13796 | 6.7 | 9.6 | 0.0038 | 2026-06-30 |
CVE-2025-47817 UPD | 6.6 | 8.8 | 0.0049 | 2025-05-10 |
CVE-2026-2649 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 0.0064 | 2026-02-18 |
CVE-2026-3536 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 0.0046 | 2026-03-04 |
CVE-2026-3538 | 6.6 | 8.8 | 0.0050 | 2026-03-04 |
CVE-2026-14387 | 6.6 | 9.6 | 0.0028 | 2026-07-01 |