Cyber Resilience

CWE · MITRE source

CWE-916Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort

Abstraction: Base · CVEs in our corpus: 124

The product generates a hash for a password, but it uses a scheme that does not provide a sufficient level of computational effort that would make password cracking attacks infeasible or expensive.

Many password storage mechanisms compute a hash and store the hash, instead of storing the original password in plaintext. In this design, authentication involves accepting an incoming password, computing its hash, and comparing it to the stored hash. Many hash algorithms are designed to execute quickly with minimal overhead, even cryptographic hashes. However, this efficiency is a problem for password storage, because it can reduce an attacker's workload for brute-force password cracking. If an attacker can obtain the hashes through some other method (such as SQL injection on a database that stores hashes), then the attacker can store the hashes offline and use various techniques to crack the passwords by computing hashes efficiently. Without a built-in workload, modern attacks can compute large numbers of hashes, or even exhaust the entire space of all possible passwords, within a very short amount of time, using massively-parallel computing (such as cloud computing) and GPU, ASIC, or FPGA hardware. In such a scenario, an efficient hash algorithm helps the attacker. There are several properties of a hash scheme that are relevant to its strength against an offline, massively-parallel attack: Note that the security requirements for the product may vary depending on the environment and the value of the passwords. Different schemes might not provide all of these properties, yet may still provide sufficient security for the environment. Conversely, a solution might be very strong in preserving one property, which still being very weak for an attack against another property, or it might not be able to significantly reduce the efficiency of a massively-parallel attack.

Last updated: 21 August 2026 20:21 UTC

Cumulative inbound coverage

How completely the frameworks we cross-walk collectively cover this — the verdict is the strongest single mapping (overlapping partials are not summed); breadth shows the corroboration behind it.

Collective: partial · 1 mapping(s) from 1 framework(s): CAPEC 1 (partial)

See the full cumulative-coverage rollup →

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

This weakness contributes to A04:2025 Cryptographic Failures.

Control responseHuman-reviewed

Answering this weakness across the control lifecycle, from our framework cross-walks.

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53 / CSF Protect)
  • AT-5 Contacts with Security Groups and Associations
  • PR.DS-01
  • PR.PS-06
  • IA-5 Authenticator Management
Detect
Catch it (CSF Detect / Respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V11.4.2

NIST 800-53 r5 controls that address this weakness (1)AI-assisted

Control Title Family Why it addresses this CWE
AT-5Contacts with Security Groups and AssociationsATInformation from security contacts highlights password hashing methods with insufficient computational effort, preventing their adoption.

Top CVEs of this weakness type, ranked by Risk Priority

CVE Risk CVSS EPSS Published
CVE-2018-10618 8.29.80.10122018-08-01
CVE-2020-14516 8.010.00.04102021-03-18
CVE-2005-0408 7.99.80.04742005-02-14
CVE-2019-6563 7.69.80.01752019-03-05
CVE-2001-0967 7.59.80.00952001-08-31
CVE-2018-15680 7.49.80.00792018-09-05
CVE-2018-15681 7.49.80.00752018-09-05
CVE-2019-17216 7.49.80.00752019-10-06
CVE-2021-32519 7.49.80.00852021-07-07
CVE-2021-36767 7.49.80.00692021-10-08
CVE-2022-37164 7.49.80.00602022-09-08
CVE-2022-37163 7.39.80.00502022-09-08
CVE-2024-5743 7.29.80.00372025-01-13
CVE-2026-30789 7.29.80.00272026-03-05
CVE-2026-30790 7.19.80.00222026-03-05
CVE-2019-19735 7.09.10.00772019-12-30
CVE-2023-46133 6.99.10.00452023-10-25
CVE-2023-46233 6.99.10.00632023-10-25
CVE-2023-33243 6.78.10.04422023-06-15
CVE-2024-3183 6.58.10.02052024-06-12
CVE-2026-45787 6.59.10.00102026-05-28
CVE-2020-14512 6.38.10.00822020-08-25
CVE-2020-14389 6.38.10.00822020-11-17
CVE-2022-1235 6.38.20.00552022-04-05
CVE-2022-36071 6.38.30.00452022-09-02