Cyber Resilience

Mapping NoteWeekly

Mapping note: the standard chain loses cross-site request forgery

Updated 12 August 2026 · Timeframe: Current CAPEC-to-ATT&CK coverage; weakness rotates weekly

32%68%Attack patterns with a technique (177, 31.7%)Dead-end (no technique) (382, 68.3%)
How often the CWE-to-CAPEC-to-ATT&CK chain dead-ends · security-resilience.ai

The common way to connect a weakness to attacker behaviour chains it through attack patterns (CAPEC) to techniques (ATT&CK). This week's weakness, CWE-352 (cross-site request forgery): 4 attack pattern(s) reference it and the chain reaches 0 ATT&CK technique(s). Only 177 of 559 attack patterns carry any technique at all, so common weaknesses dead-end. We map weakness to technique directly, so the link survives.

Why it matters

A tool built on that chain reports no attacker techniques for cross-site request forgery, which is a mapping failure, not a fact about the weakness. Absence in a chained mapping usually means the chain broke, not that the weakness is harmless.

What to do

Our take

Mapping frameworks directly, instead of chaining through a lossy intermediate, is a concrete accuracy advantage we can show rather than assert.

Earlier issues

Past states of this signal, most recent first.

09 August 2026 Mapping note: the standard chain loses path traversal

Timeframe: Current CAPEC-to-ATT&CK coverage; weakness rotates weekly

32%68%Attack patterns with a technique (177, 31.7%)Dead-end (no technique) (382, 68.3%)

The common way to connect a weakness to attacker behaviour chains it through attack patterns (CAPEC) to techniques (ATT&CK). This week's weakness, CWE-22 (path traversal): 5 attack pattern(s) reference it and the chain reaches 0 ATT&CK technique(s). Only 177 of 559 attack patterns carry any technique at all, so common weaknesses dead-end. We map weakness to technique directly, so the link survives.

02 August 2026 Mapping note: the standard chain loses SQL injection

Timeframe: Current CAPEC-to-ATT&CK coverage; weakness rotates weekly

32%68%Attack patterns with a technique (177, 31.7%)Dead-end (no technique) (382, 68.3%)

The common way to connect a weakness to attacker behaviour chains it through attack patterns (CAPEC) to techniques (ATT&CK). This week's weakness, CWE-89 (SQL injection): 6 attack pattern(s) reference it and the chain reaches 0 ATT&CK technique(s). Only 177 of 559 attack patterns carry any technique at all, so common weaknesses dead-end. We map weakness to technique directly, so the link survives.

26 July 2026 Mapping note: the standard chain loses cross-site scripting (XSS)

Timeframe: Current CAPEC-to-ATT&CK coverage; weakness rotates weekly

32%68%Attack patterns with a technique (177, 31.7%)Dead-end (no technique) (382, 68.3%)

The common way to connect a weakness to attacker behaviour chains it through attack patterns (CAPEC) to techniques (ATT&CK). This week's weakness, CWE-79 (cross-site scripting (XSS)): 6 attack pattern(s) reference it and the chain reaches 0 ATT&CK technique(s). Only 177 of 559 attack patterns carry any technique at all, so common weaknesses dead-end. We map weakness to technique directly, so the link survives.