CVE-2023-22316
Pixela Pix-Rt100 Firmware 2.1.1_eq101 … 2.1.2_eq101
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NSummary
CVE-2023-22316 is a medium-severity Hidden Functionality (CWE-912) vulnerability in Pixela Pix-Rt100 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Redundant Access (T1108); ranked at the 21th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-26479
Vulnerability Data
Hidden functionality vulnerability in PIX-RT100 versions RT100_TEQ_2.1.1_EQ101 and RT100_TEQ_2.1.2_EQ101 allows a network-adjacent attacker to access the product via undocumented Telnet or SSH services.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Documenting every system component at the required granularity and reviewing the inventory detects or prevents hidden functionality from remaining undetected.
Recovery eliminates hidden functionality or backdoors introduced during compromise.
Policy requires supplier transparency and testing to detect hidden functionality or backdoors inserted in the supply chain.
Screening high-risk technical positions lowers the probability that hidden functionality or backdoors will be added by authorized personnel.
Hunting identifies hidden functionality used for persistence or evasion after initial compromise.
TSCM surveys discover and eliminate hidden surveillance functionality that would otherwise remain undetected in the environment.
Change control, approval gates, and flaw tracking force hidden functionality to be either documented or discovered and removed.
Vetting and integrity controls during acquisition reduce the likelihood of hidden backdoors or malicious functionality introduced by suppliers.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can discover undocumented functionality before release.
Change management processes can catch unauthorized additions but do not inherently prevent hidden functionality from being introduced.
Monitoring activities can detect anomalous behavior from hidden functions but do not eliminate the weakness.
Secure development life cycle mandates documented requirements and design reviews that would expose undocumented hidden functionality.
Application security requirements explicitly define expected functionality, making hidden features a violation.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require transparent, documented designs that preclude hidden functionality.