Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-22435

Memory Safety in Honeywell Experion Server 501.1 – 501.6hf8

Published
13 July 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0060 46th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-22435 is a high-severity Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697) vulnerability in Honeywell Experion Server. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Experion server may experience a DoS due to a stack overflow when handling a specially crafted message.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-23585Same product: Honeywell Direct Station
CVE-2023-25078Same product: Honeywell Direct Station
CVE-2023-24474Same product: Honeywell Direct Station
CVE-2023-24480Same vendor: Honeywell
CVE-2023-26597Same vendor: Honeywell
CVE-2026-14686Shared CWE-697
CVE-2020-5849Shared CWE-697
CVE-2023-46658Shared CWE-697
CVE-2024-53861Shared CWE-697
CVE-2026-32322Shared CWE-697

Affected Assets

honeywell
experion server
501.1 — 501.6hf8 · 510.1 — 510.2hf12 · 511.1 — 511.5tcu3
honeywell
experion station
501.1 — 501.6hf8 · 510.1 — 510.2hf12 · 511.1 — 511.5tcu3
honeywell
engineering station
510.1 — 511.5tcu3 · 520.1 — 520.1tcu4 · 520.2 — 520.2tcu2
honeywell
direct station
510.1 — 511.5tcu3 · 520.1 — 520.1tcu4 · 520.2 — 520.2tcu2

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-787

Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly require correct logic for security comparisons and thereby prevent this class of flaw.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect incorrect comparison flaws before deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect comparison logic.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate correct comparison logic for security decisions.

prevents

Secure architecture principles can require robust comparison mechanisms for access decisions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address avoiding incorrect comparison operators and logic.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References