Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-23476

Access Control in Ibm Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 – 23.0.0

Published
02 August 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0042 34th percentile
Risk Priority 15 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-23476 is a low-severity Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) vulnerability in Ibm Robotic Process Automation. Its CVSS base score is 3.1 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.latest is vulnerable to unauthorized access to data due to insufficient authorization validation on some API routes. IBM X-Force ID: 245425.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-49825Same product: Ibm Robotic Process Automation
CVE-2024-49824Same product: Ibm Robotic Process Automation
CVE-2023-25680Same product: Ibm Robotic Process Automation
CVE-2023-42006Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2023-25924Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-38329Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2023-45185Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2023-38368Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36157Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-47102Same vendor: Ibm

Affected Assets

ibm
robotic process automation
21.0.0 — 23.0.0
ibm
robotic process automation for cloud pak
21.0.0 — 23.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 5 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-863

Periodic review and update of procedures reduces incorrect authorization implementations over time.

addresses: CWE-863

Supervision identifies cases where authorization logic incorrectly permits unauthorized actions.

addresses: CWE-863

Defining permitted attribute values and auditing modifications reduces the chance of incorrect authorization outcomes due to tampered or missing labels.

addresses: CWE-863

The authorization process and usage restrictions help prevent incorrect authorization for remote access types.

addresses: CWE-863

Establishing configuration and connection requirements helps ensure correct rather than incorrect authorization for wireless access.

addresses: CWE-863

Establishing connection authorization processes for mobile devices helps ensure authorization decisions are correctly implemented rather than incorrect.

addresses: CWE-863

Monitoring account use, notifying on changes, and reviewing accounts for compliance corrects incorrect authorization assignments.

addresses: CWE-863

Ensures authorization decisions for external system use are correctly implemented and enforced.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Defining, enforcing, and reviewing access authorizations and least privilege directly prevents incorrect authorization checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring consistency between access rights and classification plus formal approval steps ensures that the authorization logic correctly distinguishes between entities that should and should not be granted access.

prevents

Enforcing policy-driven approval and role-change reviews stops incorrect or stale authorization decisions from remaining in effect after job changes or terminations.

prevents

By tying access rights to identity, device, location and classification, the control reduces the likelihood that an authorization decision will be based on an incorrect or bypassed policy.

References