Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-24154

RCE in Totolink T8 Firmware v4.1.5cu

Public PoCRCECommand Injection
Published
03 February 2023
Modified
26 March 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.019 78th percentile
Risk Priority 87 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-24154 is a critical-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Totolink T8 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 22% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

TOTOLINK T8 firmware version V4.1.5cu contains a command injection vulnerability in the setUpgradeFW function, triggered via the slaveIpList parameter. The issue is tracked as CVE-2023-24154, carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8, and is categorized under CWE-77.

An unauthenticated attacker with network access can supply a malicious slaveIpList value to execute arbitrary operating-system commands on the device. Successful exploitation grants full control over the router, allowing arbitrary code execution with impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Public references consist of proof-of-concept details hosted on GitHub that demonstrate the injection vector; no vendor advisory or patch information is provided in the available references.

EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.3113 on 2025-01-22 before receding to the current score of 0.1490, indicating a distinct period of increased exploitation interest after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TOTOLINK T8 V4.1.5cu was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the slaveIpList parameter in the function setUpgradeFW.

CWE(s)
CWE-77

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-24156Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2023-24151Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2023-24157Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2023-24152Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2023-24150Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2023-24153Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2024-8574Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2024-8075Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2024-8077Same product: Totolink T8
CVE-2024-46419Same product: Totolink T8

Affected Assets

totolink
t8 firmware
v4.1.5cu

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments none match
none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References