Security Resilience

CVE-2023-25675

Google Tensorflow ≤ 2.12.0

Published
25 March 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0039 32th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-25675 is a high-severity Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697) vulnerability in Google Tensorflow. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Deep Learning Frameworks.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

TensorFlow is an open source machine learning platform. When running versions prior to 2.12.0 and 2.11.1 with XLA, `tf.raw_ops.Bincount` segfaults when given a parameter `weights` that is neither the same shape as parameter `arr` nor a length-0 tensor. A fix…

more

is included in TensorFlow 2.12.0 and 2.11.1.

CWE(s)
CWE-697

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
Deep Learning Frameworks
Risk Domain
N/A
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: tensorflow, machine learning, tensorflow

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-25669Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-27579Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25673Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25666Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25671Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25670Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25662Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25660Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25667Same product: Google Tensorflow
CVE-2023-25665Same product: Google Tensorflow

Affected Assets

google
tensorflow
≤ 2.12.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.5.20 Addressing information security within supplier agreements partial match
removes
A.5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation partial match
removes
A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
blocks

Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect comparison logic.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
blocks

Application security requirements can mandate correct comparison logic for security decisions.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
blocks

Secure architecture principles can require robust comparison mechanisms for access decisions.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards directly address avoiding incorrect comparison operators and logic.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-697, a pillar-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References