CVE-2023-27579
Google Tensorflow ≤ 2.12.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-27579 is a high-severity Incorrect Comparison (CWE-697) vulnerability in Google Tensorflow. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as Deep Learning Frameworks.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-0889
Vulnerability Data
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. Constructing a tflite model with a paramater `filter_input_channel` of less than 1 gives a FPE. This issue has been patched in version 2.12. TensorFlow will also cherrypick the fix commit…
more
on TensorFlow 2.11.1.
- CWE(s)
AI Security AnalysisAI
- AI Category
- Deep Learning Frameworks
- Risk Domain
- N/A
- OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
- None mapped
- Classification Reason
- Matched keywords: tensorflow, machine learning, tensorflow, tensorflow
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure development practices directly require correct logic for security comparisons and thereby prevent this class of flaw.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect incorrect comparison flaws before deployment.
Secure development lifecycle includes code review and testing that can catch incorrect comparison logic.
Application security requirements can mandate correct comparison logic for security decisions.
Secure architecture principles can require robust comparison mechanisms for access decisions.
Secure coding standards directly address avoiding incorrect comparison operators and logic.
Secure authentication mechanisms rely on correct comparison of credentials or tokens.