CVE-2023-28047
Dell Display Manager ≤ 2.1.0
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-28047 is a high-severity Least Privilege Violation (CWE-272) vulnerability in Dell Display Manager. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Steganography (T1001.002); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-31772
Vulnerability Data
Dell Display Manager, versions 2.1.0 and prior, contains an arbitrary file or folder creation vulnerability during installation. A local low privilege attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the execution of arbitrary code on the operating system with high…
more
privileges.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 3 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
—
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Review and update requirements help detect and correct least privilege violations in practice.
Access reviews verify and enforce adherence to least privilege by identifying excess permissions.
Requiring specification of intended system usage and access authorizations, plus periodic reviews, supports enforcement of least privilege.
Separation of duties is a direct mechanism to enforce least privilege by ensuring no individual receives more access than required for their isolated responsibilities.
Enforces the least privilege principle to avoid violations of minimal necessary access.
Enforcing only the minimal set of functionality implements least privilege by eliminating unneeded capabilities that could be abused.
The control mandates acknowledgment of least-privilege expectations, making violations by authorized users less likely.
Risk Executive role ensures least privilege is applied uniformly rather than left to individual system owners or projects.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Directly enforces least-privilege policy and ongoing review that prevents failure to drop elevated rights after privileged operations.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Restricts and monitors privileged utility programs, directly addressing the need to drop elevated rights immediately after use.
Privileged access rights explicitly require least-privilege assignment and timely revocation after elevated operations.
Secure coding practices can prevent least-privilege violations but do not constitute the control itself.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Ubuntu 24.04 (1 rule)
- V-270689 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS must prevent all software from executing at higher privilege levels than users executing the software and the audit system must be configured to audit the execution of privileged functions. blocks CWE-272
Windows 10 (1 rule)
- V-220712 Only accounts responsible for the administration of a system must have Administrator rights on the system. blocks CWE-272