Security Resilience

CVE-2023-29122

Published
05 November 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 6.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0017 5th percentile
Risk Priority 47 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-29122 is a medium-severity Incorrect Ownership Assignment (CWE-708) vulnerability in Enelx (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 6.7 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-16 (Security and Privacy Attributes) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Under certain conditions, access to service libraries is granted to account they should not have access to.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
T1003.001 LSASS Memory Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS).
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
T1010 Application Window Discovery Discovery
Adversaries may attempt to get a listing of open application windows.
T1011 Exfiltration Over Other Network Medium Exfiltration
Adversaries may attempt to exfiltrate data over a different network medium than the command and control channel.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-4008Shared CWE-708
CVE-2025-5467Shared CWE-708
CVE-2024-41773Shared CWE-708
CVE-2023-20044Shared CWE-708
CVE-2024-9633Shared CWE-708
CVE-2025-14262Shared CWE-708
CVE-2026-40196Shared CWE-708
CVE-2024-45417Shared CWE-708
CVE-2024-45426Shared CWE-708
CVE-2025-5069Shared CWE-708

Affected Assets

Enelx
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 4 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces approved authorizations on resource access, which structurally prevents assignment of ownership outside the intended control sphere.

Provides the mechanism to associate and manage security attributes such as ownership, directly stopping incorrect owner assignment.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 partial match
blocks

Defining, enforcing and reviewing access permissions and entitlements directly addresses correct ownership assignment for resources.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.15 only requires defining a topic-specific access control policy and determining requirements; it does not itself enforce rules or stop exploitation of incorrect ownership assignment

degrades

Identity-management processes define who may own resources, yet do not guarantee correct assignment at creation time.

blocks

Access-rights provisioning includes ownership assignment; fixing CWE-708 directly supports this control's intent.

blocks

Role definitions can require ownership accountability, but the control itself does not address technical assignment errors.

blocks

Privileged-access rules often include ownership checks, yet the control focuses on elevated rights rather than ownership correctness.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (higher-evidence rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

RHEL 7 (1 rule)
  • V-204392 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must be configured so that the file permissions, ownership, and group membership of system files and commands match the vendor values. blocks CWE-708

References