Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-30854 is a high-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Wwbn Avideo. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 8% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
AVideo is an open source video platform that contained an OS command injection vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-30854, in the authenticated endpoint /plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php prior to version 12.4. The flaw, assigned CWE-78, permitted remote code execution and received a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8 reflecting network-accessible exploitation with low attack complexity and low privileges required.
An authenticated attacker could supply crafted input to the vulnerable endpoint and execute arbitrary operating system commands on the server, achieving full remote code execution with the privileges of the web application process. No user interaction or special network positioning was needed beyond valid credentials.
The GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-6vrj-ph27-qfp3 states that the issue is resolved in AVideo 12.4; administrators should upgrade to that release to eliminate the injection vector.
EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.7021 on 2026-03-04 before receding to the current value of 0.3223, indicating a clear post-disclosure increase in observed exploitation interest.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-1218
Vulnerability Data
AVideo is an open source video platform. Prior to version 12.4, an OS Command Injection vulnerability in an authenticated endpoint `/plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php` allows attackers to achieve Remote Code Execution. This issue is fixed in version 12.4.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.5V1.2.8V15.2.5
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.
Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.