Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-32073 is a high-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Wwbn Avideo. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
WWBN AVideo, an open source video platform, contains a command injection vulnerability in versions 12.4 and earlier at the endpoint plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php when the CloneSite plugin is enabled. The flaw permits remote code execution and serves as a bypass for the earlier patch addressing CVE-2023-30854 in versions up to 12.3. It is tracked under CWE-77 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.8.
An authenticated attacker with low privileges can send crafted requests over the network to the affected endpoint and execute arbitrary commands on the server, resulting in full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No user interaction is required and the attack complexity is low.
The issue is resolved in commit 1df4af01f80d56ff2c4c43b89d0bac151e7fb6e3; the project’s GitHub security advisories recommend upgrading to a patched release and disabling or removing the CloneSite plugin on unpatched instances until the update can be applied.
EPSS for the CVE reached a peak of 0.2133 after disclosure, indicating a measurable increase in observed exploitation interest that warrants renewed attention for exposed AVideo deployments.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-1451
Vulnerability Data
WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions 12.4 and prior, a command injection vulnerability exists at `plugin/CloneSite/cloneClient.json.php` which allows Remote Code Execution if you CloneSite Plugin. This is a bypass to the fix for CVE-2023-30854, which affects…
more
WWBN AVideo up to version 12.3. This issue is patched in commit 1df4af01f80d56ff2c4c43b89d0bac151e7fb6e3.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.3V1.2.5V1.2.8V1.2.9
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.
Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.
Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.
Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.
Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.
Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.