Security Resilience

CVE-2023-31241

Snapone Orvc ≤ 7.3.0

Published
22 May 2023
Modified
09 December 2024
CVSS Score v3.1 8.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0076 54th percentile
Risk Priority 63 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2023-31241 is a high-severity Unprotected Alternate Channel (CWE-420) vulnerability in Snapone Orvc. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Fallback Channels (T1008); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Snap One OvrC cloud servers contain a route an attacker can use to bypass requirements and claim devices outright.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1008 Fallback Channels Command And Control
Adversaries may use fallback or alternate communication channels if the primary channel is compromised or inaccessible in order to maintain reliable command and control and to avoid data transfer thresholds.
T1027 Obfuscated Files or Information Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to make an executable or file difficult to discover or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit.
T1027.004 Compile After Delivery Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to make payloads difficult to discover and analyze by delivering files to victims as uncompiled code.
T1027.008 Stripped Payloads Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to make a payload difficult to analyze by removing symbols, strings, and other human readable information.
T1027.010 Command Obfuscation Stealth
Adversaries may obfuscate content during command execution to impede detection.
T1027.013 Encrypted/Encoded File Stealth
Adversaries may encrypt or encode files to obfuscate strings, bytes, and other specific patterns to impede detection.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-31245Same product: Control4 Ca-1
CVE-2023-28412Same product: Control4 Ca-1
CVE-2023-28386Same product: Control4 Ca-1
CVE-2025-56558Shared CWE-420
CVE-2024-8038Shared CWE-420
CVE-2023-52718Shared CWE-420
CVE-2025-52968Shared CWE-420
CVE-2023-4570Shared CWE-420
CVE-2025-13315Shared CWE-420
CVE-2024-6099Shared CWE-420

Affected Assets

snapone
orvc
≤ 7.3.0

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-420

Usage restrictions and authorization for remote access protect against unprotected alternate channels.

addresses: CWE-420

TSCM surveys detect and neutralize unprotected alternate channels introduced by surveillance equipment or modifications.

addresses: CWE-420

Removes or disables unprotected alternate I/O channels that could otherwise be used to bypass primary controls.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

DE.CM-01 partial match
blocks

Network monitoring can surface use of unprotected alternate channels but does not prevent the design flaw.

PR.DS-02 partial match
blocks

Protecting all data-in-transit directly mitigates unequal channel protection though the control addresses broader transit scenarios.

PR.IR-01 partial match
blocks

Network protection from unauthorized access inherently requires securing every channel, not just primaries.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Network security controls ensure all channels receive equivalent protection, directly addressing unprotected alternate channels.

blocks

A.8.21 ensures that network services have identified and enforced security features (authentication, encryption, access rules, monitoring) on allowed channels; it does not address or stop exploitation of an unprotected alternate channel that the product itself leaves exposed.

degrades

Network segregation can reduce exposure of alternate channels but does not guarantee equivalent protection levels.

blocks

A.8.3's core (access restriction per policies, config mechanisms, identity/group controls, isolation, dynamic techniques with auth/encryption/time-bound rules) stops exploitation of unprotected alternate channels in the dominant case of differing logical protections; the bounded remainder is physical alternate channels (explicitly scoped to PE family in analogous 800-53 anchors) plus fully external channels outside any managed system/app/service.

References