Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-32029 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Microsoft Excel. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 1% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Microsoft Excel contains a remote code execution vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-32029. The flaw is an out-of-bounds read (CWE-125) that affects the application's handling of specially crafted spreadsheet files and carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 7.8.
An attacker can exploit the issue by convincing a user to open a malicious Excel document on a local system. Because the attack vector requires user interaction but no privileges or additional authentication, successful exploitation grants the attacker the ability to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the current user, resulting in full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Microsoft has published security updates addressing the vulnerability through its update guide, and Cisco Talos has released a detailed technical analysis (TALOS-2023-1730) that includes indicators for detection and verification of the fix.
The EPSS score for this CVE currently stands at 0.4033, indicating a moderate and stable probability of exploitation in the wild.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-36316
Vulnerability Data
Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.
Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.
Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.
Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.