Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2023-34552 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Ezviz Cs-C6N-B0-1G2Wf Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-38607
Vulnerability Data
In certain EZVIZ products, two stack based buffer overflows in mulicast_parse_sadp_packet and mulicast_get_pack_type functions of the SADP multicast protocol can allow an unauthenticated attacker present on the same local network as the camera to achieve remote code execution. This affects…
more
CS-C6N-B0-1G2WF Firmware versions before V5.3.0 build 230215 and CS-C6N-R101-1G2WF Firmware versions before V5.3.0 build 230215 and CS-CV310-A0-1B2WFR Firmware versions before V5.3.0 build 230221 and CS-CV310-A0-1C2WFR-C Firmware versions before V5.3.2 build 230221 and CS-C6N-A0-1C2WFR-MUL Firmware versions before V5.3.2 build 230218 and CS-CV310-A0-3C2WFRL-1080p Firmware versions before V5.2.7 build 230302 and CS-CV310-A0-1C2WFR Wifi IP66 2.8mm 1080p Firmware versions before V5.3.2 build 230214 and CS-CV248-A0-32WMFR Firmware versions before V5.2.3 build 230217 and EZVIZ LC1C Firmware versions before V5.3.4 build 230214.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Likely Mitigating Controls AI
Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.
Out-of-bounds writes that corrupt control flow or inject shellcode are rendered non-executable by the same memory protections.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121