Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-42773

Intel Power Gadget ≤ 3.6.0

Published
16 May 2024
Modified
28 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0022 13th percentile
Risk Priority 59 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-42773 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization (CWE-707) vulnerability in Intel Power Gadget. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper neutralization in Intel(R) Power Gadget software for Windows all versions may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-45315Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-38581Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-46691Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-45217Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-41234Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-45736Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2023-46689Same product: Intel Power Gadget
CVE-2025-26633Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-43572Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2023-28404Same product: Microsoft Windows

Affected Assets

intel
power gadget
≤ 3.6.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 4 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing can discover missing or incorrect neutralization logic.

Input validation directly enforces well-formed data and security properties before processing.

Output filtering enforces neutralization properties on data leaving the system.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input/output neutralization and validation to prevent malformed data handling.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require proper neutralization of inputs and outputs, eliminating CWE-707.

finds

Security testing can detect neutralization flaws but does not itself implement the required controls.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevent improper neutralization.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for data validation and sanitization controls addressing neutralization weaknesses.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include canonicalization and safe parsing, mitigating but not fully covering neutralization issues.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271523 OL 9 must check the GPG signature of locally installed software packages before installation. prevents CWE-707

References