Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-43076

Dell Powerscale Onefs 8.2.0 – 8.2.2

Published
02 November 2023
Modified
20 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0062 47th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-43076 is a medium-severity Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime (CWE-401) vulnerability in Dell Powerscale Onefs. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell PowerScale OneFS 8.2.x,9.0.0.x-9.5.0.x contains a denial-of-service vulnerability. A low privilege remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to cause an out of memory (OOM) condition.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-42426Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-26481Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-43935Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-47239Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-26480Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-25969Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2025-43883Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2023-43087Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2024-49602Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs
CVE-2023-44295Same product: Dell Powerscale Onefs

Affected Assets

dell
powerscale onefs
8.2.0 — 8.2.2 · 9.2.1 — 9.2.1.24 · 9.4 — 9.4.0.15

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper memory allocation/deallocation via coding standards, reviews, and tooling.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unreleased memory, providing partial coverage of the weakness.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates memory-management practices that reduce missing-release defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify explicit memory-release rules, partially mitigating the weakness.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles include resource-management guidelines that address memory leaks.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require proper allocation/deallocation, covering most of this weakness.

finds

Capacity management may detect memory exhaustion symptoms but does not prevent the coding flaw.

References