CVE-2023-46393
Gougucms 4.08.18
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2023-46393 is a high-severity Improper Cleanup on Thrown Exception (CWE-460) vulnerability in Gougucms Gougucms. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked at the 37th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2023-50613
Vulnerability Data
gougucms v4.08.18 was discovered to contain a password reset poisoning vulnerability which allows attackers to arbitrarily reset users' passwords via a crafted packet.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper exception handling and resource cleanup.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC mandates exception-handling and cleanup practices that reduce improper state after thrown exceptions.
A.8.26 requires identifying and specifying security requirements (including resilience against attacks like SQL injection) during development or acquisition; it does not itself implement exception handling or cleanup logic that would stop CWE-460 from being exploitable.
A.8.27 mandates establishing and applying secure engineering principles (including secure-by-design, least privilege, fail-securely, and design reviews) but does not itself stop an exception-cleanup defect from being introduced in code or from being exploitable once present; the weakness can still be exploited.