Cyber Resilience

CVE-2023-46681

Buffalo Vr-S1000 Firmware ≤ 2.37

Published
26 December 2023
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0025 17th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2023-46681 is a high-severity Argument Injection (CWE-88) vulnerability in Buffalo Vr-S1000 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 17th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper neutralization of argument delimiters in a command ('Argument Injection') vulnerability in VR-S1000 firmware Ver. 2.37 and earlier allows an authenticated attacker who can access to the product's command line interface to execute an arbitrary command.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-45741Same product: Buffalo Vr-S1000
CVE-2023-46711Same product: Buffalo Vr-S1000
CVE-2023-51363Same product: Buffalo Vr-S1000
CVE-2026-45777Same vendor: Buffalo
CVE-2026-27650Same vendor: Buffalo
CVE-2023-49038Same vendor: Buffalo
CVE-2024-26023Same vendor: Buffalo
CVE-2025-12556Shared CWE-88
CVE-2024-3367Shared CWE-88
CVE-2026-4145Shared CWE-88

Affected Assets

buffalo
vr-s1000 firmware
≤ 2.37

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper input validation and command construction to prevent argument injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect argument injection but does not prevent it at the source.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent argument injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe command-line argument handling and escaping.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage unsafe command invocation patterns and favor safer APIs.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require proper neutralization of command arguments, directly eliminating CWE-88.

none

Change management can catch unsafe command patterns during reviews but is not a direct mitigation.

References