CVE-2024-0987
Kuerp Project Kuerp ≤ 1.0.4
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LSummary
CVE-2024-0987 is a medium-severity Improper Output Neutralization for Logs (CWE-117) vulnerability in Kuerp Project Kuerp. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-16764
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Sichuan Yougou Technology KuERP up to 1.0.4. Affected is an unknown function of the file /runtime/log. The manipulation leads to improper output neutralization for logs. The exploit has been disclosed to…
more
the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-252252. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.1.2V1.2.1V1.2.3
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect output neutralization when log messages are constructed from untrusted input.
Input validation reduces the chance that specially crafted data reaches log-message construction routines.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices and coding standards directly require output sanitization for logs.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding standards explicitly require correct output encoding and escaping to preserve message structure.
Security testing can detect log injection flaws but does not prevent them at the source.
Logging control directly requires proper log generation and handling, which mitigates improper output neutralization.
Monitoring activities rely on trustworthy logs but do not ensure log message integrity.
Secure SDLC includes coding standards that reduce log-related weaknesses but does not specifically address logging.
Application security requirements include explicit rules for safe output handling and encoding.