Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-10100

Path Traversal in Binary-Husky Gpt Academic 3.83

Public PoCPath Traversal
Published
17 October 2024
Modified
11 July 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0062 47th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-10100 is a high-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Binary-Husky Gpt Academic. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 47th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Privacy and Disclosure risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A path traversal vulnerability exists in binary-husky/gpt_academic version 3.83. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of the file parameter, which is open to path traversal through URL encoding. This allows attackers to view any file on the host system,…

more

including sensitive files such as critical application files, SSH keys, API keys, and configuration values.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
LLM Application Platforms
Risk Domain
Privacy and Disclosure
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
gpt_academic is an AI academic assistant built on ChatGPT API for tasks like literature search, reading, polishing, and generation, fitting Enterprise AI Assistants category. Vulnerability reported on AI/ML bug bounty platform confirms AI relevance.

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-11037Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-10948Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2025-10236Same product: Binary-Husky Gpt Academic
CVE-2024-3403Shared CWE-22
CVE-2026-29871Shared CWE-22
CVE-2026-4502Shared CWE-22
CVE-2026-23483Shared CWE-22
CVE-2026-35485Shared CWE-22
CVE-2026-6590Shared CWE-22
CVE-2024-6090Shared CWE-22

Affected Assets

binary-husky
gpt academic
3.83

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.

Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.

References